YouTube bans satire about COVID19 vaccines that “contradicts expert consensus”—seriously
Join our free email list here.
I just received a second strike for violating the Community Guidelines of YouTube; if I get another one, which I probably will, and my appeals are all denied, which they probably will be, my humble little channel, NWO Reporter, which has been moldering in the basement of YouTube for years, will be taken down.
I don’t want to lose my channel, but I have some appreciation for the cartoonish dark humor of the situation. Not only are the offending videos satire, the reason for the strikes is super-creepy, and straight out of the 1984 playbook.
YouTube: servant of the masters
The reason for the strikes is that YouTube no longer allows “claims about COVID-19 vaccination that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or the World Health Organization (WHO).”
In other words, if you discover that a gaggle of powerful eugenicists without a conscience are trying to wipe out a sizeable chunk of humanity, the proper course of action is to keep your mouth shut about it.
Or, for the less cynical, if there is conflicting opinion about the official COVID19 vaccine narrative, the correct thing to do, according to the Community Guidelines, is to pretend there isn’t.
Am I just old-fashioned, or is prohibiting debate in what purports to be a field of science the stuff nightmares are made of? Instead of engaging in civil discussion based on reason, we should wait for the party line to be announced, and follow instructions? It’s like the entire YouTube community has been sent back to kindergarten.
For the time being, my offending videos — The many benefits of COVID19 vaccination and The COVID19 vaccines are really working! — are still being allowed to molder in the sub-basement of Bitchute, the current designated space for ‘alternative’ content.
An experiment?
I wonder what would happen if I put up a video on YouTube about my CVax Risk page, where I calculate the mathematical risk of COVID19 vaccination, based on VAERS data.
Nothing on that page contradicts anything any health authority has said—because none of them have calculated the risk of COVID19 vaccination, using VAERS data or any other data. It’s impossible to contradict something that doesn’t exist.
And informing people of the fact that more serious injuries and deaths have been reported to VAERS from the COVID19 vaccines than from all other vaccines combined for the last 31 years doesn’t contradict anything any health authority has said, because none of them have said anything about the massive increase in VAERS reports at all. It’s impossible to contradict silence.
But it’s probably not worth goading the toad, just for a minuscule chance to continue to molder in YouTube’s basement. Whatever is running YouTube, it doesn’t care about logic or reason—it cares about promoting COVID19 vaccines, and it will continue to find more and better ways to do it.