“No pandemic” coverup of 2020 US democide continues; plus a bombshell: 2020 was a bumper year for life insurance industry
Join our free email list here.
Dr. David Martin
After my last article on how the “no pandemic” narrative is being used to cover up excess US deaths in 2020, a reader sent me this recent interview with popular talking head Dr. David Martin, in which he insisted there were no excess deaths in 2020—saying they didn’t occur until after the vaccine rollout. This deception was so brazen, and delivered with such authoritative conviction, it really got me stewing, so I decided to break it down here.
While stewing, I was notified that Dr. Denis Rancourt has recently been promoting the “no pandemic” narrative, shown in this video. This is not exactly a surprise, since Rancourt claimed back in June 2020 that, although there were excess deaths in the US, they were due solely to toxic treatment and prevention protocols. He still makes that claim, and apparently extends that conclusion to all the 500,000-plus excess deaths that occurred through the remainder of 2020.
Dr. Denis Rancourt
Personally, I don’t think it can even be argued in good faith that toxic treatment and prevention protocols suddenly killed 50,000 people in NYC over 8 weeks, then just as suddenly stopped killing. I think pretty much any analyst in the life insurance industry would agree with me on that.
In any case, even if toxic treatment and prevention protocols were responsible for over a half-million US deaths in 2020, then realistically, I don’t think it could have been accidental—it had to have been intentional mass murder—DEMOCIDE. Or at the very least, reckless homicide.
Hilarious Conflicts: Both Martin and Rancourt claim credit for introducing the “no pandemic” propaganda
I found some unexpected dark humor in a dark situation, as Martin and Rancourt both claimed to be the first to break the story that “There was no pandemic.” That’s right—both claimed bragging rights for introducing propaganda to coverup excess deaths. Talk about a new low for journalism and science.
But each had a very different spin on the “no pandemic” narrative. Dr. Martin claimed he broke the story “several years ago,” when he pointed out there were no excess deaths in 2020—that is, according to the “official financial records” of the life insurance industry. Martin said a virus bio-weapon was introduced in the US in 2020—but it turned out to be a dud, so no one died. However, he says the COVID19 vaccines are a global genocide.
Denis Rancourt’s data: “Figure 8: All-cause mortality by week for NYC, starting in 2013, in black. The red vertical line indicates the date at which the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic. The grey line is simply the same data on a vertically expanded and shifted scale, for visualization.”
Dr. Rancourt claimed he broke the “no pandemic” story with his June 2020 paper on excess deaths in NYC and elsewhere around the world. Rancourt used the official mortality data, illustrated in this chart from his paper—so we are basically in agreement about excess deaths.
Rancourt believes in virology, but says no dangerous virus was responsible for the excess deaths—they were solely due to toxic treatment and prevention protocols. He has previously described the NYC mass casualty event as a probable “mass homicide by government response.”
Confused yet? Good. Just focus on the takeaway message they are both peddling: THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC. THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC. THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC.
Dr. David Martin: “Official financial records” of the life insurance industry prove there were no excess deaths in 2020; therefore, there was no pandemic
In this clip, the interviewer began by introducing the idea we are in the midst of a genocide. Dr. Martin confirmed, but immediately clarified there were no excess deaths in 2020, according to the “official financial records” of the life insurance industry. He said the financial accounting of the life insurance industry is “simple,” and is “the only thing that actually really measures deaths.”
“[…] We did not have excess deaths in 2020. As a matter of fact, in 2020, during allegedly the peak of the pandemic, life insurance claims were at an all-time low, profits for life insurance companies were actually high. Total revenue for life insurance actually went up in 2020, with the total number of death benefit claims going down. So, if we were to believe something as simple as, I don’t know [sarcastically], the accounting for the only thing that actually really measures deaths, we would realize that in 2020, far from excess deaths, and far from a pandemic, we had an unusually light year of deaths according to the official financial records, and it is not until the introduction of the injection that we start seeing the uptick in excess deaths.”
2020 was a bumper year for the life insurance industry? WOW.
I’m going to defer here to Martin’s superior knowledge about the financial state of the life insurance industry in 2020, because I have no idea. I’m actually blown away by this blockbuster revelation—that the life insurance industry thrived in a year of unprecedented deaths. That’s incredible. Because contrary to Martin’s claim, there were undoubtedly excess deaths in 2020—a lot of them—something Denis Rancourt, and anyone else who looks at the official mortality data, would agree with.
In the clip below, Martin explained how such a profitable year could have happened, even if there were a lot of excess deaths—because of clauses in insurance policies that allow companies to avoid paying out in the event of a declared pandemic. But Martin didn’t say life insurance claims were denied right and left—he said there were no excess deaths in 2020, according to the “simple” “official financial records” of the life insurance industry. That’s impossible, due to the size and unprecedented nature of the 2020 increase in deaths.
I’m sure statisticians in the life insurance industry could blow us away with all kinds of sophisticated predictive statistics, but calculating excess deaths does not involve predictions, and it’s not that complicated. Basically, it involves estimating the number of deaths that should have occurred, based on historical numbers, and counting the difference between the estimate and the actual number of deaths. Even the most genius of numbers experts cannot simply make 500,000 extra deaths in 2020 disappear, when the largest yearly increase in deaths over the last 55 years was well under 100,000.
Consider the chart below of US population, deaths and death rate from 1968 thru 2022. If the most brilliant statistician in the world, with a long string of letters after her name, claimed she conducted a highly sophisticated statistical analysis, and determined there was nothing unusual about the number of deaths in 2020, would you believe her? I hope your innate commonsense would at least lead you to entertain doubts, even in the face of very persuasive authority.
See this link for the source of this data.
After shaming people for not liking to look at the data, Dr. Martin tries to slime his way around the obvious in the clip below, by declaring, “The financial data does not lie, the public health data does.” That’s funny, because I’d be willing to bet the life insurance industry relies on the official mortality data in the CDC WONDER database to conduct their own analyses, like everyone else does—where else would they get it? Are we supposed to believe the life insurance industry has its own secret private database of US death records, that’s superior to the official one everyone else uses?
In the alternative, if the insurance industry does use its own secret private database of deaths instead of the official CDC WONDER database, and it shows there were no excess deaths in 2020, then maybe Dr. Martin just exposed one of the most massive criminal frauds involving the alteration of government records of all time.
Dr. Denis Rancourt: Official government records show there were excess deaths in 2020, but all were due to toxic treatment and prevention protocols, not a virus; therefore, there was no pandemic
The following clip strikes me as very odd, since although Rancourt uses the same mortality data I use—the official mortality data in the CDC WONDER database—and we are therefore presumably in agreement about the number of excess deaths in 2020, he is obviously downplaying the excess deaths, almost to the point of leaving us wondering whether any occurred at all. The clip picks up after Rancourt’s self-introduction as a powerful intellectual maverick with extensive expertise and accomplishments as a multidisciplinary scientist:
“And when I heard the COVID propaganda, I knew immediately that it was intense propaganda, and that it couldn’t possibly be true, because they were yelling that we were all gonna die, and I couldn’t see any dead bodies out in the street. And, I, Idid, I went out in the street and I looked around, and I couldn’t see any dead people, no matter what they said. And, as a scientist, what I decided to do was to look at all-cause mortality data. Our nations collect very good data about the number of deaths. That’s something you cannot be biased about—the person either died or they didn’t. You know that they died, you know their age, you know where they died. And you collect that data. Countries collect very good data about deaths and births. So that is unbiased, hard data. […]
“That is the data I’ve been using since the very beginning of this so-called pandemic. And, ah, we, my research group, we were the first to say, back in an article that was published in June of 2020, that when we look at all cause mortality data, there is no pandemic. There was a peak of deaths at the beginning in certain hot-spots that was directly due to how people were treated in hospitals and care homes. It was quantitatively due to that. There is no…ah, so I can tell you, after 3 years of intense study that we are continuing, I can tell you the following thing—and this is hard scientific conclusions from looking at the data: (1) There was no pandemic; (2) there was no particularly virulent pathogen whatsoever, there is no evidence for it; (3) there is nothing that is spreading that causes death; the mortality doesn’t cross borders. […]
Note how Rancourt began by telling us he knew the COVID19 narrative was wrong from the start, because he personally didn’t see people dropping dead around him—implying there were few, if any, excess deaths. That’s an argument he knows, as a statistician, is very faulty reasoning in a society of millions, where it’s unlikely any individual would notice even an unusually large number of deaths. Besides, through his investigation of the data “as a scientist,” he discovered there were, in fact, a lot of excess deaths.
Rancourt said his conclusions that excess deaths were solely caused by toxic treatment and prevention protocols are “hard scientific conclusions from looking at the data.” However, I was unable to find much among Rancourt’s writings on COVID that would help make even a shaky case for that. In addition to his June 2020 paper, he has a research paper on the impact of lockdowns, a research paper on the impact of isolating people, and a few papers on related research in other countries—but nothing that even came close to making a plausible and cohesive case that the extreme US death waves in 2020 were solely or primarily caused by toxic treatment and prevention protocols.
Conclusions
Denis Rancourt’s claim that any excess deaths in 2020 were caused by toxic treatment and prevention protocols is widely repeated among both virus believers and nonbelievers—but the only evidence I’ve ever seen to support it is Rancourt’s June 2020 paper. So, it would be more accurately described as a largely unsupported hypothesis than an established fact.
David Martin claims there is a “simple” financial accounting from the life insurance industry that shows there were no excess US deaths in 2020. There isn’t. I invite Dr. Martin to prove me wrong by emailing me that accounting, and I will humbly eat crow.